Recently an English teacher in my school had given an assignment to her students, where they were supposed to write about the reasons why Mr. Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. There was a fair number of rather intellectual-sounding ones which debated on the political aspects of the award (real and imaginary); a popular one being that the award would serve as an encouragement for more progress with peace talks and to foster better relations with adversaries from a bygone era. There were also the more critical ones which condemned the jury for rewarding inaction - what exactly has Mr. Obama achieved so far that he hasn't already preached? Of all the responses, my favourite answer; albeit a very politically incorrect one; was :
What has Barack Obama done so far?
1. Made many passionate speeches that made my mom cry
2. Inspired little black kids all around the world to be the next President of the United States
I can't remember the third; but I'm sure it had something to do with intellectual prose.
Anyway, what has Obama done so far?
1. Got his men out of Iraq
2. ...and threw them back into Afghanistan
3. Approved the fiscal stimulus package which has slowly, painfully - but is surely healing their ravaged economy
4. Been friendly with the guys over at the Middle East (Arabs) - the whole "I offer my hand, but you unclench your fist first" approach
5. Tried to get Israel and Palestine (and the Arabs) to shake hands
6. Frowned when Israel decided to go ahead with the settlements on the West Bank anyway
7. Condemned big bonuses and promised to draw clear line between government and firms
8. Downsize companies that were once "too big too fail"; end of deregulation era
9. Promised to bring UN back into the international scene
10. Imposed huge tariff on China's tyres (gave in to lobbying despite ultra-liberalism)
11. Has not said anything about Kyoto Protocol - the US get "special" treatment and signs separate agreement where they get save the environment on their on terms instead of subjecting themselves to targeted levels(and now the rest of the developed countries want to jump on the bandwagon as well - Farewell, KP)
12. Unsettled Iran nuclear talks (and talks of possible sanctions)
13. Called Kanye West a jackass
14. Followed up on SALT II with Russia - even considering complete nuclear disarmament (but Gorbachev already brought this one up back in the eighties - he got a Nobel peace prize too by the way)
14. and of course, the health reform bill has finally been passed by the senate
I stand corrected; and I apologise if I've made any gaping mistakes - I admit I haven't been reading much on world affairs lately. So with that said; perhaps it's best we see the Peace prize in the light of an incentive; coupled with the President's unpretentious optimism and occasionally over-pronounced liberalism - perhaps real Change might finally come to the America, and the rest of the world as well.
Oh yea, speaking of health reform, I'd just like to offer my two cents' worth on the issue; with particular address to the defenders of reform and equality and enemies of the market/capitalism:
To balance things out a bit, subjecting health care to the market forces is not a completely heartless and inhumane thing to do, contrary to popular opinion - the society does get some benefit out of it, and a considerable amount, too. Think of it this way,
1. while providing free health care will grant accessibility to all regardless of wealth or income; we must remember that sources are finite - and that for subsidies to be provided, there must be an equally huge price to be paid somewhere else.
2. This "somewhere else" may very well be the Research and Development department; and now that the government indirectly decides who gets what, where and when - people don't really have much of a choice when it comes to treatment.
3. While an efficient system might help to reduce long waiting lists; setting a fixed number of patients to be treated within a period of time might act as a perverse incentive - medical staff will now be encouraged to give sub-standard treatment. Don't believe me? Recall the nurses who used to poke and shout at you at the yearly dental check-up in school.
4. Compulsary health insurance would mean more people taking their health for granted. Just like how college students in general don't care about General studies since it's not going to cost them their future. (unless of course, you are sponsored - then that requires an entirely different CBA)
5. You don't get to choose your treatment or medication; in crude terms - health care really is being rationed. For example, say you contract a disease which is currently uncurable; and a new cure is found and is mass produced; however because the government now decides which medicine to provide the masses, it will ultimately have to choose lower costs over individual health. Which means you'll either have to pay for the new cure out of your own pocket or be prepared to stick it out for the rest of your life with the inefficient medicine - which you're getting for free.
6. Less Research and Development funds mean less discoveries, less variety of treatment and ultimately less cures.
So before you start speaking about human rights and how free markets are actually the work of the devil, you might want to consider the case above. Free health care simply means a lot more people will be living a few years longer; although it may mean a lot less suffering for some, for others it's a case of devaluing human life - you're just another number in a cost-benefit analysis. It also slows down the progress of national medical care in general; as there is a lack of incentive for development. In a free market, privately-funded medical care would mean that there's a strong demand - which would lead to competitive suppliers/firms sensitive to their needs.
However, I understand that the price mechanism may work to the advantage of the rich - they're the only ones who can afford pushing up the prices - but with efficient and systematic public aid (perhaps along the lines of Medicare/Medicaid) combined with an effective comparative research programme that will not only compare prices and the efficiency of different types of medicine; but at the same time seek the means to eliminate unnecessary costs in the production stage; I am certain we will find a middle outlet someday.
In the meantime, stop comparing Grey's Anatomy to your local GH. They're being paid ten times more than the nurse who's telling your crying kid to shut up.
And more importantly, they have McDreamy.
Sadly, you don't.